🌱 You have a saved draft — would you like to pick up where you left off?
Pro — Full Logic Model

Unlock Pro access

Pro includes your complete theory of change, alignment to SIA guidelines, evidence gap analysis, and consultant-ready report.

Wellspring Pro — one-off $149 NZD
or, if you already have a code
That code isn't valid. Please try again or contact hello@seek2harvest.com
Just want to see it first? Try the demo →
Wellspring · Social Impact Platform

Tēnā koutou. Welcome.

Every Wellspring report is grounded in five wellbeing frameworks — Māori, Pacific, and international — so your impact is understood on its own terms from the start. These are official frameworks from Treasury, the Ministry for Pacific Peoples, and international bodies: they carry over between governments and aren't tied to any one administration. Here’s what sits behind your report.

🌊
He Ara Waiora
The Treasury's te ao Māori view of wellbeing that begins with wairua and the health of the natural world, not just people.
🏠
Te Whare Tapa Whā
Wellbeing as a wharenui on four walls: physical, mental and emotional, family, and spiritual health. Developed by Sir Mason Durie and used across Aotearoa's health and social sectors.
🌺
Lalanga Fou
The Ministry for Pacific Peoples' vision for Pacific Aotearoa: thriving languages and cultures, prosperous communities, healthy people, and confident young people.
🏛️
NZ Living Standards Framework
The Treasury's cross-government framework for what sustains communities across generations, used to inform Budget decisions under any administration.
🌐
OECD Better Life Index
An international yardstick, so your local impact can be understood beyond Aotearoa.
Every Wellspring report is also assessed against NZ Social Investment Agency (SIA) readiness guidelines — a separate readiness check alongside the five wellbeing frameworks above, not a sixth framework.
Your data stays in your browser. Nothing is shared without your consent.
Wellspring is free to use. Built by Seek2Harvest Solutions · seek2harvest.com
Social impact platform · Aotearoa NZ

Understand the real difference your work makes

Map your inputs to social outcomes — including the consequences you didn't plan for. Grounded in NZ's wellbeing frameworks and the Social Investment Agency guidance.

Built for organisations that don't have in-house impact measurement expertise on staff — Wellspring fills that gap, so you don't need to hire a consultant to show the real value of your work.

SIA aligned · LSF · He Ara Waiora · MPP
Maps positive & negative consequences
Visual map + plain-language summary

Choose your depth

Start simple, go deeper when ready.

Before you start — have this handy
  • Your organisation and initiative name, and who it serves
  • A short description of what the initiative does
  • Your funding sources and rough amounts for the year
  • Staff and volunteer time involved
  • The changes you've seen (or expect) in the people you serve
  • Pro only: your total investment figure, and how strong your evidence is
Nothing here is required to begin — you can start Simple with just the basics and add more as you go.
Simple Free
What do you invest? What changes for people? 5 minutes, any organisation.
Inputs → Outcomes → Impacts
Standard Free
The full chain — what you do, what you produce, what changes — with positive and negative consequences mapped honestly.
Inputs → Activities → Outputs → Outcomes → Impacts
Full logic model Pro
Complete theory of change with unintended consequences, displacement effects, evidence gaps and SIA criteria mapping. For consultants.
Full chain + unintended consequences + evidence gaps + SIA guideline alignment
Your progress saves automatically in this browser as you go. It won't follow you to a different browser or device, so finish up where you started.
Step 1 of 4
Your organisation & initiative
Tell us about your organisation and the specific initiative you're mapping.
Step 2 of 4
What goes in
Inputs are the resources your organisation invests — money, people, time, partnerships. Be honest about the true cost, not just direct funding.
Why this matters: Mapping inputs honestly lets you understand the real cost of your outcomes — and shows funders what it actually takes to make your programme work.
Financial inputs
Not sure what counts? Click one to start, then fill in the amount:
Government contract / grant
Philanthropic / trust funding
Fee-for-service revenue
Corporate sponsorship
Donations / koha
People & time
Not sure what counts? Click one to start. Both fields are needed — it's easy to forget the time commitment if it's not asked for separately.
Full-time staff
Part-time staff
Volunteers
Board / governance
Contractor / consultant
Step 3 of 4
What you do & what you produce
Activities are the things your programme actually does. Outputs are the direct, measurable results — the evidence that those activities happened.
Outputs ≠ outcomes — here's the one-line version: outputs are what you did, outcomes are what changed because you did it. "Delivered 180 coaching sessions" is an output — it counts activity. "60% found sustainable employment" is an outcome — it counts a real change in someone's life. Both matter, but only one of them is the actual impact.
Key activities — what your programme does
Key outputs — countable results of your activities (not the same as outcomes — see above)
Step 4 of 4
What actually changes — and the full consequences
For each outcome, tell us whether the consequence is positive, negative, or mixed. Be honest — unintended effects make your analysis credible and useful.
What to do here: pick every outcome that applies below, then for each one say whether it was positive, negative, or mixed — and note any unintended consequences alongside the ones you planned for. Every initiative has some: dependency, displacement of other providers, cultural harm from well-meaning programmes, opportunity costs. Naming these isn't weakness — it's what sophisticated funders and the SIA expect to see.
Select your outcomes — pick all that apply?Outcomes are changes in people's lives, not things you did. If you're unsure, ask: "so what?" — running a programme is an output; someone feeling more connected to whānau is the outcome.
Employment & earnings
Financial stability
Housing stability
Physical health
Mental health & wellbeing
Skills & qualifications
Safety & reduced offending
Whānau & family functioning
Cultural identity & te reo
Pacific cultural wellbeing
Social connections
Sense of purpose
Environment & whenua
Civic participation
Step 5 of 5 — Pro
Theory of change & assumptions
Document the core assumptions underpinning your impact chain. This makes your reasoning testable and shows funders you've thought critically about your own work.
Why this matters for the SIA: The Social Investment Agency increasingly asks not just what you do, but why you believe it works and what evidence supports that belief.
Core assumption
Contextual factors
Labour market demand in target sector
Stable housing for participants
Whānau / family support
Ongoing government funding
Community trust in organisation
Participant readiness and motivation
Partner organisation capacity
Cultural safety of programme design
Evidence quality & consultant notes
Strong — independent evaluation exists
Moderate — internal data and sector evidence
Emerging — early data and plausible logic
Developing — logic model only, limited data yet
SROI inputs — investment & adjustment factors Pro
Before you start — what goes here

Investment is everything it cost to run this initiative for the year you're measuring: salaries, contractor fees, venue, materials, a fair share of overheads. Use the real total — understating it inflates your return and funders will notice.

The adjustment factors stop you over-claiming. If you're unsure, the conservative defaults below are a sound starting point. Lower them only when you have evidence to justify it (e.g. a control group showing the change wouldn't have happened anyway).

Honest, slightly cautious numbers here make your whole SROI more credible — not less impressive.
Adjustment factors. Standard SROI practice discounts the headline value so you don't over-claim. The defaults below are conservative starting points — adjust them to your own evidence. Each is a percentage.
The change that would have occurred without you. (SROI term: "deadweight")
The share due to other people or services. (SROI term: "attribution")
A problem pushed elsewhere, not solved. (SROI term: "displacement")
—
—
0
Inputs mapped
0
Outcomes
0
Positive
0
Risks / negatives
Plain-language impact summary
Visual impact map
Impact chain — Initiative
Positive outcome / impact
Negative / unintended
Mixed consequence
Outcomes — detailed view with framework alignment
Untick any framework that doesn't apply to your kaupapa — the tags below update immediately, nothing else changes.
He Ara Waiora
Te Whare Tapa Whā
Lalanga Fou
NZ Living Standards Framework
OECD Better Life Index
SROI against NZ Treasury CBAx Pro
This section estimates the dollar value of the social good your initiative created, and compares it to what you invested — so you can see, in plain terms, whether the return justifies the cost. The ratio below and the walkthrough underneath it explain exactly how that number is built.
Cultural value — recognised, not monetised Pro
Alignment to SIA guidelines & evidence gap analysis Pro
Recommended next steps